Every sanctions alert, investigated, documented, and audit-ready before it reaches your analyst.
Adjuvanto assists the full resolution workflow — the investigation, the structured analysis, the documentation, the audit trail. The analyst reviews a completed analysis, not rows of potential matches.
Built with and tested by compliance professionals.
.png)
What We're Solving
Screening identifies the risk. Execution is still entirely manual.
Existing platforms stop at the alert. The investigation, the contextual research, the policy interpretation, the case note, all of it lands on your analysts. Every time. As volumes grow, that model doesn't scale. It just asks more of human attention than it can reliably deliver.
Across vocabularies
Different companies call this function by different names. Sanctions screening, denied party screening, restricted party screening, embargo screening, sanctions list screening. The vocabulary varies. The operational problem does not. Whatever term your organisation uses, the workflow that begins once an alert is generated is where compliance programs are actually built or left incomplete.
Alert Fatigue
Thoroughness degrades under volume
A compliance program is only as strong as the quality of attention on each alert. When analysts work through high volumes of repetitive alert investigations under time pressure, the depth of each review suffers, not because analysts are careless, but because no model built this way can sustain consistent rigour at scale.
Manual Investigation
Every resolution starts from scratch
When an alert comes in, the analyst opens tabs, reads the sanctions program description, searches the entity name, checks prior decisions, and then drafts a case note from nothing. That research happens entirely outside the screening tool, undocumented and unrepeatable. The next analyst will do it all again.
Documentation Gap
The case note reconstructs rather than records
Documentation is typically written after the decision has already been made, from memory. What should be a contemporaneous record of reasoning becomes a retrospective narrative. That gap is precisely what regulators look for.
Decision Variance
Inconsistent decisions across teams
Two analysts reviewing the same alert may reach different conclusions depending on their training, their interpretation of policy, and how their forty-eighth alert of the day compares to their first. Across regions, shifts, and subsidiaries, that inconsistency accumulates into regulatory exposure.
Audit Exposure
No audit trail without manual reconstruction
When a regulator requests evidence of due diligence, compliance teams pull records from their denied party screening tool, case management systems, shared drives, and email threads and assemble them by hand. The process takes days, introduces gaps, and adds stress to an already high-stakes situation.
How It Works
A new operating model for sanctions screening.
Adjuvanto operates as a centralised sanctions resolution platform integrated directly into your business systems. Every entity passes through a structured, automated workflow.
01
Data Interpretation
Incoming entity data is standardised before screening begins. Abbreviations, misspellings, and transliterations from Arabic, Chinese, and Cyrillic scripts are resolved automatically.
Automated
02
Multi-Signal Screening
The normalised entity is screened against a complete set of global sanctions lists, updated daily. The engine applies exact, fuzzy, phonetic, and transliteration-aware matching.
Automated
03
Pre-Clear Logic
Each auto-cleared alert generates a permanent audit record: the signals evaluated, the rules applied, and the reason for clearance. It is retrievable in the audit trail as a system-resolved case, distinct from analyst-approved ones.
Automated
04
Structured Investigation
The system assembles the investigation package for the analyst: name-similarity analysis, sanctions programme context, company policy match, and a confidence score. The analyst reviews the package and makes the call.
AI-Assisted
05
Human Review
The compliance professional reviews the recommendation and approves, overrides, or escalates. The analyst is the final decision maker at every stage. No undefended decisions.
Analyst Review
06
Audit-Ready Record
Every decision is captured in a single audit record: the alert, the investigation package, the analyst's reasoning or the system's clearance logic, and the final outcome. System-resolved and analyst-approved cases are tagged and separately retrievable.
Automated
Why Adjuvanto
Built for the realities of sanctions due diligence
Adjuvanto does not change the underlying sanctions lists and does not make compliance decisions on behalf of your team. What it does is present every alert through a more intelligent and structured lens — so the judgment your compliance professionals apply is better informed, more consistent, and fully documented every time.
Effectiveness
A more effective compliance program
Resolution quality stays constant as volumes grow. The same rigour at 3,000 alerts per month as at 300. No additional headcount, no degradation, no dependency on who is available.
Investigation
Every alert arrives investigated
You review a completed analysis, not rows of potential matches. The context gathering, the structured reasoning — done before you open the case. Your expertise goes to the decisions that genuinely need it.
Consistency
Same standard, regardless of who handles it
The same alert, reviewed by any analyst in any region, produces the same depth of investigation and the same documentation quality. No outcome depends on who happened to be on shift.
Audit Trail
Audit-ready by default, not by reconstruction
Every decision is captured with the entity data, the signals evaluated, the reasoning, and the final human judgment. When a regulator asks, the answer is immediate. No shared drives. No manual assembly.
Human Control
The analyst decides. Always.
Adjuvanto assists the resolution workflow. It does not make compliance decisions. The compliance professional reviews, approves, overrides, or escalates at every stage. The system structures the work. The human owns the judgment.
Get in touch
Start the conversation.
If you’re exploring ways to improve your sanctions screening process or simply want to learn more about how we work, get in touch.
We review your current screening workflow and show how a more consistent and defensible sanctions screening process could work in your organisation.